May 18, 2018

"I’m Ready for the Female Takeover of the Democratic Party/The Venusification of the Democratic Party is on, and this man says it’s high time."

Headline at The Daily Beast for a ditsy column by Michael Tomasky.

56 comments:

tim in vermont said...

Sigh.... Tried to read it...

Is it that hard for him to get laid?

Ralph L said...

Bring on the hysteria.
As if we need more of it.

rehajm said...

Sounds like an admission that nobody’s in charge at the moment

Caldwell P. Titcomb IV said...

The false first sentence has what appears to be a link to supporting information, but the linked article is about a different subject.

Greg said...

My first thought too Tim, just from the headline. I suspect he has some harassment history in his background also.

tcrosse said...

No mention of old whats-her-name.

chickelit said...

Great! Let’s make his idea go venereal

chickelit said...

“No mention of old whats-her-name.”

She has already begun fundraising.

Darrell said...

They tried Hillary and it didn't work, so, by all means, let's try females.

JackWayne said...

Shouldn’t your lede have the word twink in it?

gspencer said...

The Ds have long had lots and lots of girly men; Ds were pussified long ago.

Mid-Life Lawyer said...

That article is getting close to the level that I like to retweet with the comment, "Not a parody" but it's not quite that absurd.

traditionalguy said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
traditionalguy said...

The prime motivation in human psychology turns out to be having power over people. Sorry, Freud.So automatically money is the #1 motive and your out group replacing the in group's power is right there with it.

Ergo: no boundary fences or laws are allowed until after we take power.

This proposed riding of the Women over Men as a power strategy requires dividing into 2 groups. But the traditionally American strategy of E Pleuribus Unum requires one group with one nation under one God.

So making men into Twinks is part of this strategy.

tcrosse said...

Well, he's no Alan Alda.

Bay Area Guy said...

I don't know about the Venusification of the Democrat Party, but the pussification of the party has already taken place.

chickelit said...

Democrats are always recruiting pole-sitters. It’s more hands on than baking cookies.

Bay Area Guy said...

@Darrell,

"They tried Hillary and it didn't work, so, by all means, let's try females."

They haven't tried Caitlin Bruce Jenner yet or, for diversity, maybe RuPaul.

traditionalguy said...

The Dems have to import tough men to be their guerilla force. MS-13 is their careful planned invasion force. That's why Trump's oppsing MS-13 has caused a panic erruption of faked news.

Gunner said...

Isn't Tomaskey the same guy who wrote in 2012 that Romney speaking to the NAACP was more racist than him not speaking to them?

tcrosse said...

Startle, startle little twink.

Michael K said...

Is Maxine Waters available to run the Party?

The Cracker Emcee Refulgent said...

Maybe the transgender thing is more about groveling self-emasculation than about the freedom of dudes to become chicks. Perhaps that’s why it’s so weirdly important to the Left.

rcocean said...

Well, given the alternatives I can understand.

What men could run the Dems. Biden? Schumer? Franken? Wyden?

Its getting harder and harder to find quality Male Democrats under 50 who aren't Gay, Jewish, Muslim or hard left.

rcocean said...

IMO, unless you're making $$$ off it, you'd have to a white man without balls to be a Democrat.

Pettifogger said...

The guy says women overall are smarter about Donald Trump than men, because more women than men agree with his view. Well . . .

Then he says that women are better at economics because, when considering it, they disregard basic principles such as supply and demand. My suspicion is that he takes this view because considering supply and demand lead to conclusions he finds uncongenial.

Pettifogger said...

The guy says women overall are smarter about Donald Trump than men, because more women than men agree with his view. Well . . .

Then he says that women are better at economics because, when considering it, they disregard basic principles such as supply and demand. My suspicion is that he takes this view because considering supply and demand leads to conclusions he finds uncongenial.

Chris N said...

Sold!

Now that’s great journalism!

Where do I sign?

Henry said...

Venusification?

Not the Aphroditication?

Hector of Troy would say -- bad choice.

Henry said...

You've got to be careful with your classical references.

Venusification sounds like objectification to me.

The Erinyification seems appropriate to the moment.

Drago said...

#VaginaLivesMatter

buwaya said...

Their appeal is becoming more selective?

mockturtle said...

The Democratic Party has been in the hands of women and beta males for decades. So this is new? But I'm glad to see them double down to their own destruction.

buwaya said...

Btw, the future of the party is actually becoming much more hispanic.
At least as far as its votes.
SoCal is the leading edge of the American future, which is dystopian.
Not NorCal as that dynamic is distorted by the unique Lorien/Rivendell effect of Silicon Valley. Silly Valley really represents very few people. The actual voters of NorCal are much more like SoCal, living similar lives and getting just as hispanic.

The local Republicans have failed to appeal to hispanics.

Bay Area Guy said...

I think "Vagino-Americans" is the most fitting description of the current Democrat Party. I like adding the "o" at the end to include Beta-Males and InCells, without encroaching too far into the feminist domain.

chickelit said...

Making the DNC dudenrein.

rhhardin said...

If women couldn't vote, the political news business would collapse and it would go back to celebrity news.

Daniel Jackson said...

From Pussy Hats to the National Pussy Party

How wonderful!

Will they do lap dancing to raise political interests? Pole dancing to get out the vote.

"Hey hey baby, get into my big black car..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJqgk2XAg4k

This is perfect for a reunion of 60's radicals.

rcocean said...

As Mock turtle says the Dems have been going that way for decades.

Its officially now the party of pussy hats, twinks, and pajama boys.

JAORE said...

Tomasky votes with his vagina and so should you.

n.n said...

Separability of sex and gender. He must be trans/bisexual.

PM said...

via buwaya: "The local Republicans have failed to appeal to hispanics."

Too true and too bad. In CA, the bullhorning of illegal immigration issues retranslates to 'racism'. The fact is Hispanics generally have conservative values - family, work ethic, education, upward focus. A lost voting bloc.

Known Unknown said...

I prefer "ditzy." The z works better at communicating the thought.

Bilwick said...

Well, with certain notable exceptions, women are the Socialist Sex (or is the Gender Gap a myth), so you could see why they march lockstep into the ranks of the Democrats. Maybe the Democratic Party should call itself "the Eloi Party." Truth in advertising, and all that.

Seeing Red said...

The final nail in why women shouldn’t be allowed to vote.

n.n said...

Apartheid or separation in the Democrat Party. There is precedent.

Martin said...

God, what a boring twit!

Clyde said...

Tomasky is one of those people who remind me of a compass that only points South. He's always completely wrong, off by 180 degrees, and as such, is a reliable source of information. Whatever he recommends, you should do the complete opposite.

Big Mike said...

I'm old enough to remember when pundits routinely cautioned the Republicans that a party cannot fly with only one wing. Yet today's Democrats think they can fly using only the extreme tip of their left wind. Strange.

How many people like Conor Lamb were nominated last Tuesday? The Democrats warned themselves, yet are failing to heed their own warning.

becauseIdbefired said...

Michael Tomasky (author of the above garp, then):

I see that New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who wants to run for president, has walked back her assertion last week that Bill Clinton should have resigned over his affair with Monica Lewinsky. . . .The idea that Clinton should have resigned is insane. . .It was legal. . .Given that it remains one of the top priorities of the right to smear and discredit both Clintons in the history books

Michael Tomasky Today:

Trump’s ratings have fallen even more with women and risen among men (that is, the type of men who think it’s cool the president shagged a hot porn star and then paid her to be quiet).

Rationalize that, Tomasky.


https://www.thedailybeast.com/hell-no-bill-clinton-shouldnt-have-resigned

walter said...

Daniel Jackson said...Will they do lap dancing to raise political interests? Pole dancing to get out the vote.
--
Madonna didn't deliver on her promised blowjobs

Bilwick said...

I remember when William Buckley proposed an obituary for Eleanor Roosevelt saying "Her entire life was one long war against the syllogism." These days that war is being carried on by most "liberals," from what I can see, especially with the Rise of the Feminist Moonbats, who see logic as a tool of the White Patriarchy. No wonder Tomarsky also celebrates the repeal (he thinks) of the Law of Supply and Demand.

Bay Area Guy said...

Tomasky says he like football, bourbon and used to covet National Lampoon for the titty-shots.

Sorry, I'm not buying it.

tim in vermont said...

They haven’t tried Caitlin Bruce Jenner yet or, for diversity, maybe RuPaul.

I’d give RuPaul a listen. He’s a pretty reasonable guy.

mockturtle said...

the Rise of the Feminist Moonbats, who see logic as a tool of the White Patriarchy.

Good point, Chadwick! And, oh! I do miss Buckley!

mockturtle said...

the Rise of the Feminist Moonbats, who see logic as a tool of the White Patriarchy.

Bingo, Mr. Chadwick! And, oh! How I miss Buckley!